Copyright © 2012 BVerfG
The full German texts of the Federal Constitutional Court's decisions
that have been issued since 1 January 1998 are published here. The texts
are the official ones; they are identical with the printed versions that
the Court mails on request. Here you can find information about the linking of decisions.
The decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court are also available (in
German) via RSS news feed; further details here. In case of technical
problems, especially as regards the printing out of decisions, please
consult the technical advice given here.
Suggested citation style for our German language decisions on our web
site: BVerfG, [file reference] of [date], [paragraph no.],
http://www.bverfg.de/.
Free for non-commercial use. For commercial use, the Court's permission
is required.
of 07/19/2011
The constitutional complaint gives rise to the question of whether legal entities domiciled outside of Germany, but in a Member State of the European Union, may invoke fundamental rights of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz – GG). Moreover, it relates to compliance with the fundamental right of property in the interpretation and application of national law based on Union law.
of 11/24/2010
The application for judicial review concerns the compatibility of provisions of the Act on the Regulation of Genetic Engineering (Gesetz zur Regelung der Gentechnik, Gentechnikgesetz — Genetic Engineering Act — GenTG —in the version promulgated on 16 December 1993, BGBl I p. 2066; most recently amended by Article 12 of the Act on the Reform of the Law of the Protection of Nature and Landscape Conservation (Gesetz zur Neuregelung des Rechts des Naturschutzes und der Landschaftspflege) of 29 July 2009, BGBl I p.2542) with the Basic Law. The challenge concerns provisions on the definitions of “genetically modified organism” and “placing on the market” (§ 3 nos. 3 and 6 GenTG), on the location register (§ 16a.1, 16a.3, 16a.4, 16a.5 and § 16b.1a GenTG), on the treatment of products placed on the market (§ 16b.1, 16b.2, 16b.3 and 16b.4 GenTG) and on claims in the case of interference with use (§ 36a GenTG) which are based on the Act on the Reform of the Law of Genetic Engineering (Gesetz zur Neuordnung des Gentechnikrechts (hereinafter: Genetic Engineering Reform Act 2004 (Gentechnikneuordnungsgesetz 2004 — GenTNeuOG 2004) of 21 December 2004 (BGBl I 2005 p.186) and the Act to Amend the Genetic Engineering Act, to Amend the Genetic Engineering Implementation Act and to Amend the Novel Foods and Novel Food Ingredients Ordinance (hereinafter: Genetic Engineering Amendment Act 2008 (Gentechnikänderungsgesetz 2008 - GenTÄndG 2008) of 1 April 2008 (BGBl I p. 499).
of 08/30/2010
In essence, the constitutional complaint relates to the question as to whether the Federal Court of Justice, in rejecting a payment obligation (reprographic levy) for printers and plotters on the basis of § 54a of the Copyright Act (
Urheberrechtsgesetz - UrhG) in the version applicable until 31 December 2007 on the basis of the Act for the Reform of the Patent Fee Act and Other Acts (
Gesetz zur Änderung des Patentgebührengesetzes und anderer Gesetze) of 25 July 1994, Federal Law Gazette (
Bundesgesetzblatt - BGBl) I p. 1739 (hereinafter UrhG old), violates constitutional rights of copyright holders or of the complainant as a copyright collecting society.
see also
english press release of 09/21/2010
of 07/21/2010
The constitutional complaints relate to the unequal treatment of registered civil partners and spouses under the Gift and Inheritance Tax Act in the version according to the 1997 Annual Tax Reform Act of 20 December 1996 (Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt – BGBl) I p. 2049).
of 07/06/2010
The complainant is an enterprise involved in automotive supplies. It employs more than 1,200 employees at its production site in Schleswig-Holstein. It concluded a fixed-term employment contract with the plaintiff of the original proceedings on 18 February 2003 for the period from 19 February 2003 to 31 March 2004 without having objective reasons for the fixed term of employment. The plaintiff was deployed as a helper in the production of brake pads. All in all, the complainant concluded 56 fixed-term employment contracts with previously unemployed persons at that time in order to cover production peaks. Of these 56 new staff members, 13 employees – including the plaintiff of the original proceedings – had already reached the age of 52. According to the information provided by the complainant, the additional employees were deliberately appointed on the basis of the Law on Part-Time Working and Fixed-Term Contracts (Gesetz über Teilzeitarbeit und befristete Arbeitsverträge – Teilzeit- und Befristungsgesetz – TzBfG) in order to obtain legal security vis-à-vis actions against fixed-term employment contracts. It was said that such actions against fixed-term employment contracts had been lodged against the complainant in the past and, had they been successful, would have led to disruptions in personnel planning.
of 02/09/2010
The proceedings on the concrete review of the constitutionality of a statute, which have been consolidated for joint adjudication, relate to the question of whether the amount of the standard benefit paid to secure the livelihood of adults and children until completing the age of 14 in the period from 1 January 2005 to 30 June 2005 according to § 20.1 to § 20.3 and according to § 28.1 sentence 3 no. 1 of the Second Book of the Code of Social Law in the version of Article 1 of the Fourth Act for Modern Services on the Labour Market of 24 December 2003 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 2954) is compatible with the Basic Law.
of 07/07/2009
The constitutional complaint relates to the unequal treatment of marriage and registered civil partnerships with regard to survivors’ pensions under an occupational pension scheme for employees in the civil service according to the Rules of the Supplementary Pensions Agency for Federal and Länder Employees (Versorgungsanstalt des Bundes und der Länder – VBL).
of 06/30/2009
The subject of the
Organstreit proceedings and constitutional complaints, which have been consolidated for joint adjudication, is the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007 (OJ no. C 306/1). The proceedings relate to the German Act Approving the Treaty of Lisbon and - partly - the accompanying laws to the Act Approving the Treaty of Lisbon: The Act Amending the Basic Law (Articles 23, 45 and 93), which has already been promulgated, but not yet entered into force, and the Act Extending and Strengthening the Rights of the Bundestag and the Bundesrat in European Union Matters, which has been adopted, but not yet signed and promulgated.
see also
english press release of 06/30/2009
of 03/03/2009
The complaints requesting the scrutiny of an election relate to the permissibility of the deployment of computer-controlled voting machines, which are also referred to as electronic voting machines or “election computers”, in the elections to the 16th German Bundestag.
of 10/28/2008
In his constitutional complaint, the complainant challenges an order of G. University in G., which has been confirmed by the administrative courts at all instances, by which in place of the subject “New Testament”, for which he had previously been responsible as a lecturer at an institution of higher education, he was allocated the subject “History and Literature of Early Christianity” (now renamed “Early Christian Studies”), to be responsible for it in teaching, research and further training.
of 05/07/2008
The Organstreit proceedings (proceedings on a dispute between supreme federal bodies) relate to whether the deployment of German soldiers in NATO AWACS aircraft to monitor airspace above the sovereign territory of Turkey required the approval of the German Bundestag.
of 03/11/2008
In their application for a temporary injunction, the complainants seek a temporary suspension of the retention of telecommunications traffic data for the purposes of public security introduced by the Act for the Amendment of Telecommunications Surveillance and Other Measures of Undercover Investigation and for the Implementation of Directive 2006/24/EC of 21 December 2007 (Gesetz zur Neuregelung der Telekommunikationsüberwachung und anderer verdeckter Ermittlungsmaßnahmen sowie zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2006/24/EG (Federal Law Gazette I 2007 p. 3198; hereinafter referred to as: Act for the Amendment of Telecommunications Surveillance)).
of 02/27/2008
The subject-matter of the constitutional complaints are the provisions of the North Rhine-Westphalia Constitution Protection Act regulating, firstly, the powers of the constitution protection authority regarding various instances of data collection, in particular from information technology systems, and secondly, the handling of the data collected.
see also
english press release of 02/27/2008
of 02/26/2008
The subject of the constitutional complaints is the admissibility of photojournalistic articles on the private and everyday life of celebrities.
see also
english press release of 03/18/2008